Wednesday, May 05, 2004

This sure is an exciting time!  Next week on Tuesday, May 11th, we have the Visual Basic World Tour 2004 coming to pay us a visit.  We'll the the opportunity to interact with members of the VB team and see many of the up and coming new features in the Whidbey Visual Studio product.

The VB Roadshow (as it's also known) will be hosting our .NET User Group at Northface University.  If you'd like to come, participate (of course it's FREE), eat pizza, and have a great time register online and don't forget to invite your friends!

Join us at the Salt Lake City .NET User Group Site as well.

The VB World Tour starts at 6:00 PM and runs until 8:30 to 9:00 PM.

2825 E. Cottonwood Pkwy, 3rd Floor
Salt Lake City, Utah

The office building's doors close (and lock) at 6:00 PM so be early to get in.  See you there!

Wednesday, May 05, 2004 8:59:00 AM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Tuesday, May 04, 2004

Andrew Binstock, a columnist at SD Times, makes some very valid and interesting points concerning the software methodology known as Extreme Programming (XP) in his article 'Not So Extreme Programming'.  As one that has (in limited fashion) used Extreme Programming in the past I have been privvy to some of the benefits as well as some downfalls of the technique.  There are some definite key tenets of Extreme Programming of which I am a fan.

For example, I am a proponent of the 'Stand up Meetings' in which developers gather at the beginning of each day to set in order their tasks and resolve any foreseen roadblocks.  It's a great opportunity to make sure all of your ducks are in a row and everyone is ready to proceed with the days activities.  I am a big fan of test-driven development (TDD); I feel, however, that oftentimes developers will get too bogged down in writing tests so much that actual productivity is sacrificed.  I also am a fan of the story design technique in which a task or an activity is designed and the key actors and players are identified though I think the implementation should be different (not 3x5 cards).

I feel, however, that its disadvantages outweigh its advantages.  To begin with, in the XP way of things, applications are designed bottom-up which makes it very difficult to reach your intended destination with a solid packaging; it's a bit like building a skyscraper starting with lots of little bricks without a solid, preenvisioned foundation.  This lack of scope and real design can be detrimental to the end product.  XP projects seem to be especially geared towards smaller products; large applications are often too complex.

Refactoring, as a practice and a principle is paramount to programming and good software design - a tenet not overlooked by XP.  It seems, however, that it promotes refactoring ad nauseum.  Constant refactoring can be detrimental to the success of an application as developers are often dealing with minutiae that frankly are not that important or can be optimized later or in different ways.

Andrew to me hits his point home when he says the following:

The foundation of XP, in my view, is part of the problem: It is a radical embrace of an approach that goes from the particular to the universal. It is the purest form of bottom-up development: You never design more than what is immediately needed, you write the least amount of code that will fulfill your next test, and you design the test to provide the least amount of incremental change. After you’ve written lots of tests (frequently thousands), you clean up your code by using one of 72 refactorings—which are specifically analyzed techniques for cleaning code without changing its functionality.

The fundamental problem with this approach is that software today is complex and large, so it cannot be designed properly by using the least-increment approach and hoping that a sound product will eventuate through the organic accretion of lots of small design decisions (followed up by code cleaning).

Large, complex projects have to be designed top-down and the code must be developed to that design—regardless of its complexity.

Now, after having said all of this, I don't purport to be an XP expert by any stretch of the imagination.  Our embracing of the XP methodology was scattered at best and we picked and chose that which we saw as relevant to our team and our environment - much of it worked for us, though not everything did.  I'd welcome your comments and insights.

Tuesday, May 04, 2004 1:58:00 PM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Monday, May 03, 2004

At the beginning of the year I started an initiative with my current employer which I call Chalktalks - a name I blatently and unabashedly stole from my previous employer, Microsoft.  This is a special biweekly meeting that occurs at 7:00 AM each Monday.  To this meeting we, the various consultants, gather to share insights, knowledge, and experiences with other team members in an effort to bolster our technical abilities and broaden our horizons.

The chalktalks that we conducted at Microsoft targeted the Rocky Mountain District (comprised of Denver and Salt Lake City) and were held weekly on Fridays at 7:00 AM.  When I joined my current company I noticed a marked difference in the team atmosphere and camaraderie.  For the most part people have been unwilling to participate in team-building activities and generally have a bad attitude towards the company pent up from years passed - an attitude with which I don't deal well.

It has been a goal of mine since the beginning to help encourage team members and bolster the atmosphere here.  To this end (and with the approval of management) I started two initiatives that have been moderately successful: the chalktalks as well a a team-meeting-only 5-10 minutes 'Tips of the Trade' or (TOTT).

Although we've had so far around 9 - 10 separate chalktalks, only two individuals have actually gotten up and presented a topic to the group (usually consisting of 3-5 people of a possible 35+): myself and Scott Golightly (a coworker and our local MS Regional Director).  Not to say that I expected otherwise.  I am not really disappointed...it gives me the opportunity to plan topics with which I'm not very familiar and give a presentation on it, expanding my horizons.  The way I look at it is that they are missing out on expanding their repertoire.

Notwithstanding, I am happy to say that we've not yet missed out on a single week and have had such delightful topics as Asynchronous Processing, SharePoint Portal Server, Code Access Security, GDI+, HttpHandlers, SQL Server Tips and Tricks, et al.  It does require work above and beyond our normal responsibilities (which I think is the primary factor in others not participating) but the effort is well worth it.  I just wish the guys could see that and actually do something of their own initiative and volition toward self improvement, rather than relying on being compensated or feeling that the company owes them.

Monday, May 03, 2004 2:21:00 AM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Sunday, May 02, 2004

I ran into this while working with a client over the weekend.  My client is using VS.NET 2002 (with the .NET Framework 1.0) and is creating an in-house, intranet application to be used simultaneously by 35-50 users...ok that part doesn't matter.  Basically what it came down to is they are in the process of performing some personnel changes and wanted to ensure that prior to taking action that they had all of the source code and could continue on making changes and improvements to their software.

First of all, I'd copy the files (mostly .aspx pages) locally to my machine simply to see if I could compile the project from within Visual Studio.  Everything loaded fine except the web project.  It failed with an error 'Unable to get the project file from the web server'.  This was disconcerting.  I know I'd seen the error before (about 15 months ago) and had solved the problem but with my client looking over my shoulder the heat was on!  I had to get this to work.  I double checked all of my settings - everything seemed in order.  Interestingly I didn't get this problem with any of my web applications.

Then my memory started to function again...I recalled that VS maintains a folder called VSWebCache found in <root>\Documents and Settings\<user>\VSWebCache\<machinename>.  All I had to do was delete all of the contents of this folder and voila! it worked - I could open the project!  It turns out that VS.NET creates and uses this directory in order to facilitate offline development and as a working directory.

Simple, but stupid, solution.

Sunday, May 02, 2004 4:51:00 PM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [11]  |  Trackback
 Tuesday, April 27, 2004
Chris Brumme is quite illuminating on his finalization post.  An excellent discussion and in depth.  Therein, Chris educates us on how finalization really works and what it's all about.  A must read!
Tuesday, April 27, 2004 2:48:00 PM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Saturday, April 24, 2004

John Topley hits the nail on the head with this article about Microsoft and the world's negative view of the software giant.  This is just a copy and paste of my comments to his post:

I've had the privilege of being on the inside of MS as a consultant and on the outside as an observer. I won't reiterate your points as you make them very well and I couldn't state them better, but I'm sick and tired of the constant MS bashing and general disdain in the computing world. It's personally hurtful at times - especially when it comes from coworkers or family members. Most of the loathing and bad-mouthing is completely unfounded and without any real understanding of what goes on or why. Having been on the inside I caught a first-hand view of the energy and passion. It is awesome! People claim that MS isn't innovative or they simply steal other company's ideas (or take the companies themselves). That's just a load of bull. The folks at MS have an astounding desire to get things done and get them done well. This leads to amazing innovation. Well I won't rant on, but thank you for putting into words my exact feelings. :)

Excellent points, John!  Keep up the good work.

Saturday, April 24, 2004 12:58:00 PM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Trackback
 Friday, April 23, 2004

I'm a big fan of application optimizations (who as a developer isn't?).  There's a cool technique that many an ASP.NET programmer doesn't employ (but should) that can increase the performance of a web application.  The vast majority of pages that a web server will return is HTML-based (e.g. via .aspx or .ascx pages).  However, the time may arise in which you want to return straight XML or some binary data such as a JPEG or GIF, perhaps even a WAV file or something of that nature.

Well, it's pretty easy to write the following in an .aspx page:

private void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) {
   Response.Clear();
   Response.ContentType = “text/xml“;
   // output your xml here
}

This works pretty well.  The client makes a request to the server and gets the xml back.  Simple.

But...every .aspx page is (by default) processed by the PageHandlerFactory class.  This class has a lot of code (and overhead) to handle page requests.  If all you're wanting to do is return XML or an image for example, you can create your own handler for the request.  You do this in one of two ways:  1) implement the IHttpHandler interface or 2) create an .ashx page.

If you implement the IHttpHandler interface you'll have to do a little bit of wireup code in your web.config file to associate a client request with your class, for example:

<add verb=“*” path=“*.ext” type=“NS.MyHandler, MyHandlerAssembly” />

I'm being simplistic here and not going into all of the details, of course, but that's the gist.  Note, you'll also need to go into IIS and map the extension to the aspnet_isapi.dll ISAPI extension.  This is a powerful concept!  The requested file doesn't even need to exist!  IIS (or rather, the ISAPI) will intercept the call to the file (extant or not) and route the request to ASP.NET which in turn takes the request and your IHttpHandler implementation will do the processing.

The second approach, may be a bit more cumpersome on the dev-side but simpler on the admin side.  All you do is create a file with the .ashx extension.  This extension is already mapped in IIS to the aspnet_isapi.dll ISAPI and will automatically be picked up by ASP.NET and processed.

A disadvantage of using the .ashx approach is there is no intellisense/color-coding within VS.NET 2003 and prior (haven't yet tested on Whidbey - but I'll give it a try and report back).  As a point of clarification, there is no intellisense nor color coding when editing your source directly within the .ashx file.  However, if you opt to use code behind, you will have full IDE support.  Also, you add the <% @ WebHandler %>directive to the top of your document.

<%@ WebHandler language="C#" class="classname" %><%@ WebHandler language="C#" class="classname" %>

I found little to no documentation on this handler directive but it has been mentioned in a few MSDN articles and what not.

Regardless of the route you take, all you then need to do is provide implementation for two methods on the IHttpHandler interface:

bool IHttpHandler.IsReusable {
  get { return true; }
}
 
void IHttpHandler.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) {
}

Then you're off to the races!

This is a powerful technology that was really only previously existed for C++ ISAPI developers and is now at our fingertips.

 

Friday, April 23, 2004 6:17:00 AM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  |  Trackback

Well, here I am in sunny, beautiful Santa Barbara, California.  Coming from the cold, windy weather in Salt Lake City, Utah to this absolutely gorgeous weather is a welcome change.  I periodically travel to SB to write code with a good friend of mine.  We're working on a variety of projects, but the main one is an online (web) product configurator.  The tool is very powerful, if I do say so myself and we're excited about the progress.

Looking forward to a productive weekend of “splab app whapping.

Friday, April 23, 2004 5:52:00 AM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Wednesday, April 21, 2004

Hey, this is cool!

Microsoft is making available (for free!) the same C++ compiler that ships with Visual Studio .NET 2003 Pro.  Now you can write apps that target the Windows platform and the CLR using the Visual C++ language.

Wednesday, April 21, 2004 3:38:00 AM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback